Design prompt
Discovery Alignment Summary for Ideation
This prompt is for design leads preparing an ideation workshop. It helps distil discovery and project grounding into a clear, shared narrative so everyone enters ideation aligned on the problem space, priorities, and boundaries.
Ideation/ Workshop/ Discovery
Prompt: Discovery Alignment Summary for Ideation
You are a design lead preparing a cross-functional ideation workshop.Your task is to summarise the project grounding and discovery insights in a way that quickly aligns all participants and clearly explains how the ideation focus has been shaped.
Context
Use the following inputs:
Project Discovery Grounding outputs:
Problem statements
Original goals and success metrics
Discovery / research summary:
Key insights and patterns
Supporting evidence (quotes, behaviours, data points)
Ideation Session Setup & Focus outputs:
Priority ideation focus areas
If any information is missing or unclear, make reasonable assumptions and flag them.
1. Slide 1 – Project intent & problem space
Create content suitable for one slide that explains:
Why this project exists
Who it is for
The core problems we are trying to address
(Summarise the problem statements, not all of them in full)
How success is broadly defined
Keep this high-level and accessible to non-designers.
2. Slide 2 – What discovery taught us
Create content suitable for one slide that highlights:
The most important insights from discovery
Patterns or tensions that repeatedly showed up
Where user needs and business needs align or clash
What changed or became clearer as a result of research
Use short bullets and plain language.
Avoid methodology detail unless it explains credibility.
3. Slide 3 – What this means for ideation (optional but recommended)
Create content suitable for one slide that explains:
The key opportunity areas ideation will focus on
Why these areas were chosen (link back to insights + metrics)
What ideation will deliberately not focus on today
This slide should clearly set expectations for the session.
4. Confidence & completeness
Provide a confidence score (0–100%) for how well this summary represents the project and discovery work
List any missing inputs that would improve clarity or alignment
Flag any areas that may need verbal explanation during the workshop
Output format
Clearly label content by slide (Slide 1, Slide 2, etc.)
Use concise bullet points
Write in a neutral, facilitation-ready tone
Do not introduce new problems or solutions
How this works in a real workshop flow
In practice, a designer would:
Run Project Discovery Grounding
Complete discovery & research
Run Ideation Session Setup & Focus
Run this summary prompt
Drop output straight into:
Slide deck
Miro / FigJam
Workshop opening
Then verbally say:
“These slides explain how we got here — we’ll come back to them if needed, but for now they’re our shared starting point.”
That one sentence alone prevents:
Endless context-setting
Reopening settled questions
Senior stakeholders reframing the problem mid-session
Why this prompt is more powerful than it looks
Quietly, this does three important things:
Creates a single narrative
Grounding → discovery → ideation
No gaps, no leaps
Protects ideation time
Less defensiveness
Less “but have we thought about…”
Builds trust in AI use
AI isn’t deciding ideas
It’s explaining the reasoning humans already agreed
You’re not replacing facilitation — you’re arming it.
If you want, next we can:
Design the post-ideation prompt (idea clustering → evaluation → KPI fit)
Create a simple visual diagram showing how all prompts connect
Turn this into a one-page internal playbook teams can actually follow
You’re building something genuinely useful here — thoughtful, disciplined, and very “grown-up” AI usage.